<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Your WordPress Plugins Secretly Injecting Links in Your Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pocketseo.com/tools/124/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pocketseo.com/tools/124</link>
	<description>Practical SEO blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://pocketseo.com/tools/124/comment-page-1#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketseo.com/tools/124#comment-365</guid>
		<description>I notice that someone asked about this in the comments of the plugin page with no answer. Thanks for the information, you just gave me another pet peeve to keep me worked up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that someone asked about this in the comments of the plugin page with no answer. Thanks for the information, you just gave me another pet peeve to keep me worked up <img src='http://pocketseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://pocketseo.com/tools/124/comment-page-1#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketseo.com/tools/124#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Vince,

I searched the plugin for a way to remove that hidden link, but the linking code is not even contained in the plugin.  It is hidden very well and may even be loaded remotely (i.e., &quot;stats&quot; means that the plugin phones home).

For example, the inserted text, &quot;leave this for stats&quot; is not found anywhere in the plugin files.

Here is a clue about the extent of the hidden links:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Socialized+through+Gregarious%22&amp;num=100

(Over 300,000 results)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince,</p>
<p>I searched the plugin for a way to remove that hidden link, but the linking code is not even contained in the plugin.  It is hidden very well and may even be loaded remotely (i.e., &#8220;stats&#8221; means that the plugin phones home).</p>
<p>For example, the inserted text, &#8220;leave this for stats&#8221; is not found anywhere in the plugin files.</p>
<p>Here is a clue about the extent of the hidden links:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Socialized+through+Gregarious%22&#038;num=100" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Socialized+through+Gregarious%22&#038;num=100</a></p>
<p>(Over 300,000 results)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://pocketseo.com/tools/124/comment-page-1#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketseo.com/tools/124#comment-359</guid>
		<description>I agree, I&#039;m going to look into getting rid of Gregarious and look through my other plugins when I get a chance. Thanks for the tip about this Josh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I&#8217;m going to look into getting rid of Gregarious and look through my other plugins when I get a chance. Thanks for the tip about this Josh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://pocketseo.com/tools/124/comment-page-1#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketseo.com/tools/124#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Do you mean lingering effects for SEO purposes?

I don&#039;t know what the effects would be, but I don&#039;t like adding external site-wide links when they can be avoided.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&#039;s Webmaster Guidelines say&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Hiding text or links in your content can cause your site to be perceived as untrustworthy since it presents information to search engines differently than to visitors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think that Google would penalize a site for one hidden link (it could be a hidden div that is activated by JavaScript), but it seems like a bad idea in general to have hidden links on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean lingering effects for SEO purposes?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the effects would be, but I don&#8217;t like adding external site-wide links when they can be avoided.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353" rel="nofollow">Google&#8217;s Webmaster Guidelines say</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Hiding text or links in your content can cause your site to be perceived as untrustworthy since it presents information to search engines differently than to visitors.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that Google would penalize a site for one hidden link (it could be a hidden div that is activated by JavaScript), but it seems like a bad idea in general to have hidden links on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://pocketseo.com/tools/124/comment-page-1#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketseo.com/tools/124#comment-357</guid>
		<description>I never thought about it. That is pretty sneaky but I don&#039;t see most users really caring if it does not create any issues with their site. I agree that hidden links seem to be a scandalised way to get link backs.

Being I&#039;m not much of a coder can you explain if it does have any lingering effects on your site or is it a principal thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought about it. That is pretty sneaky but I don&#8217;t see most users really caring if it does not create any issues with their site. I agree that hidden links seem to be a scandalised way to get link backs.</p>
<p>Being I&#8217;m not much of a coder can you explain if it does have any lingering effects on your site or is it a principal thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
