http://pocketseo.com/cloaking/19 Practical SEO Techniques Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:46:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://pocketseo.com/cloaking/19/comment-page-1#comment-4 Josh Tue, 22 May 2007 05:49:30 +0000 http://pocketseo.com/cloaking/19#comment-4 It's cloaking (sending different content to search engines than is sent to browsers), but it doesn't seem well thought-out. Why rel=nofollow the internal links? That is a sure indication of cloaking. The external links have rel=nofollow on them even when visiting as Googlebot, so shouldn't that be enough to deter spammers? It’s cloaking (sending different content to search engines than is sent to browsers), but it doesn’t seem well thought-out. Why rel=nofollow the internal links? That is a sure indication of cloaking. The external links have rel=nofollow on them even when visiting as Googlebot, so shouldn’t that be enough to deter spammers?

]]> http://pocketseo.com/cloaking/19/comment-page-1#comment-3 Heather Paquinas Tue, 22 May 2007 05:42:49 +0000 http://pocketseo.com/cloaking/19#comment-3 That is really weird. Is removing nofollow really cloaking? Or is it to ward off spammers who might see nofollow and stay away from del.icio.us? That is really weird. Is removing nofollow really cloaking? Or is it to ward off spammers who might see nofollow and stay away from del.icio.us?

]]>